From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Henrich v. Town Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 9, 1995
213 A.D.2d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)

Opinion

March 9, 1995

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Ulster County (Torraca, J.).


Petitioner was appointed as a Police Officer-Part Time for the Town of Plattekill, Ulster County, in April 1977. Respondent appointed petitioner as Chief of Police, on an annual basis, from 1982 until 1993. Prior to March 1993, the post of Chief of Police was filled as a non-civil service position by designation of respondent (see, Matter of Betanzos v. Green, 95 Misc.2d 89).

Petitioner has held the noncompetitive position of Police Officer-Part Time from 1977 to the present.

On January 6, 1993, respondent did not reappoint petitioner for an additional annual term as Chief of Police. On March 3, 1993, an order and determination of the Ulster County Personnel Department (hereinafter the Department) established the position of Police Chief A and said position was allocated to the competitive class. Thereafter, an attempt was made to appoint petitioner to the position of Police Chief A. However, the Department refused to recognize the appointment due to petitioner's lack of qualifications for that position.

Petitioner presently serves as the head of the Department as the unofficial "officer in charge". Respondent now argues that the appeal is moot. We disagree. Petitioner's present position as the unofficial "officer in charge" is not identical, equivalent or synonymous with the relief requested in the verified petition (i.e., reappointment as the Town's Chief of Police).

However, we agree with respondent's contention that its failure to reappoint petitioner in January 1993 is nonreviewable. The unofficial position of Chief of Police was neither a tenured or permanent civil service position or that of a public officer which would require formal charges and a hearing prior to respondent's failure to reappoint (see, Matter of Greensmith v Incorporated Vil. of Centre Is., 109 A.D.2d 742). Accordingly, petitioner has failed to state a cause of action.

Petitioner's further contentions are without merit.

Cardona P.J., Mercure, Casey and Peters, JJ., concur. Ordered that the judgment is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

Matter of Henrich v. Town Board

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Mar 9, 1995
213 A.D.2d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
Case details for

Matter of Henrich v. Town Board

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of GUNTER HENRICH, Appellant, v. TOWN BOARD OF THE TOWN OF…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Mar 9, 1995

Citations

213 A.D.2d 814 (N.Y. App. Div. 1995)
623 N.Y.S.2d 401