From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Grancio v. Coveney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 24, 1983
96 A.D.2d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Opinion

August 24, 1983


In a proceeding to invalidate the petition designating William F.X. Klan as a candidate for the office of County Court Judge, Catherine T. England and James F.X. Doyle for the office of Family Court Judge, and Anthony R. Corso for the office of District Court Judge, First District, Suffolk County, in the Conservative Party primary election to be held on September 13, 1983, the appeal is from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Kelly, J.), dated August 22, 1983, which, after a hearing, granted the application. Judgment reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and application denied. The board of elections is directed to restore appellants' names to the appropriate ballot. Special Term invalidated the designating petition on the ground that the candidates, who are not members of the Conservative Party, failed to obtain authorization as required by subdivision 3 of section 6-120 Elec. of the Election Law. The court concluded that the Rules and Regulations of the Conservative Party of the State of New York and of the Suffolk County Committee of the Conservative Party may validly impose this requirement on candidates for judicial office even though subdivision 4 of section 6-120 expressly exempts such candidates from that requirement. We disagree. The Rules and Regulations of the Conservative Party are clearly inconsistent with the obvious legislative intent to exempt candidates for judicial office from the requirements of subdivision 3 of section 6-120 Elec. of the Election Law (Election Law, § 6-120, subd 4). Those rules and regulations, which are inconsistent with the afore-mentioned legislative intent, cannot be enforced. Accordingly, the court's reliance on Matter of Kahler v McNab ( 48 N.Y.2d 625) is misplaced. Mollen, P.J., Gibbons, Brown and Rubin, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Matter of Grancio v. Coveney

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Aug 24, 1983
96 A.D.2d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)
Case details for

Matter of Grancio v. Coveney

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ANTHONY GRANCIO, Respondent, v. FRANK COVENEY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Aug 24, 1983

Citations

96 A.D.2d 917 (N.Y. App. Div. 1983)

Citing Cases

Mike v. Livingston Cnty. Bd. of Elections

"We agree with petitioner that the caucus rule passed by respondents, which mandated that only registered…

Matter of Grancio v. Coveney

The court properly dismissed the application because, as conceded, petitioner failed to serve notice of…