From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gentile v. Niesley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1963
19 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Summary

In Matter of Gentile v. Niesley (19 A.D.2d 723) the Appellate Division, Second Department reversed an order returning the matter to the Civil Service Commission for reconsideration and regrading.

Summary of this case from Mtr. of Duffy v. Carey

Opinion

July 1, 1963


In a proceeding under article 78 of the Civil Practice Act: (a) to annul a determination of the Civil Service Commission of the County of Nassau denying the petitioner's application to raise the grade which he had received in a competitive examination for the position of "Principal Construction Inspector" in the Planning Commission of said county; and (b) to direct the Planning Commission to appoint him to such position, both Commissions appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County, entered July 5, 1962, which granted the petitioner's application to the extent of "returning the matter" to them "for reconsideration and regrading in accordance with the opinion" rendered by the Special Term. Order reversed on the law and on the facts, without costs; application denied; and proceeding dismissed without costs. Findings of fact contained or implicit in the decision and opinion at Special Term which may be inconsistent herewith are reversed, and new findings are made as indicated herein. Petitioner alleged merely that he gave the correct answers to certain essay questions propounded to him, and he attacked the grade which he received. The record discloses an honest difference of opinion between him and the Civil Service Commission. When such a difference exists, the courts may not properly intrude and attempt to resolve the difference (see Matter of Connaughton v. Taylor, 285 App. Div. 1169, affd. 1 N.Y.2d 864; Matter of Simone v. Conway, 284 App. Div. 95, affd. 308 N.Y. 692). We do not pass upon the question whether sufficiently objective grading procedures have been established (see Matter of Quinn v. Streeter, 175 Misc. 932; cf. Matter of Fink v. Finegan, 270 N.Y. 356; Matter of Weissbard v. Kaplan, 25 Misc.2d 560). Beldock, P.J., Ughetta, Hill, Rabin and Hopkins, JJ., concur. [ 35 Misc.2d 1005.]


Summaries of

Matter of Gentile v. Niesley

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 1, 1963
19 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

In Matter of Gentile v. Niesley (19 A.D.2d 723) the Appellate Division, Second Department reversed an order returning the matter to the Civil Service Commission for reconsideration and regrading.

Summary of this case from Mtr. of Duffy v. Carey
Case details for

Matter of Gentile v. Niesley

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ARTHUR J. GENTILE, Respondent, v. JOHN R. NIESLEY et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 1, 1963

Citations

19 A.D.2d 723 (N.Y. App. Div. 1963)

Citing Cases

Mtr. of Duffy v. Carey

Nevertheless, in view of the holdings of the courts on similar applications, this court considers itself…