From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Connaughton v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 8, 1956
136 N.E.2d 13 (N.Y. 1956)

Opinion

Argued April 27, 1956

Decided June 8, 1956

Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the second judicial department, PHILIP HUNTINGTON, J.

Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General ( Abe Wagman, James O. Moore, Jr., and Jerome O. Glucksman of counsel), for appellants.

Harold L. Herzstein for Eugene F. Connaughton and others, respondents.



Order affirmed, with costs. We regard the appellants as parties interested and aggrieved and, having fully considered the questions posed, agree on the merits with the decision of the courts below. No opinion.

Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Connaughton v. Taylor

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Jun 8, 1956
136 N.E.2d 13 (N.Y. 1956)
Case details for

Matter of Connaughton v. Taylor

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EUGENE F. CONNAUGHTON et al., Respondents, against OSCAR…

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Jun 8, 1956

Citations

136 N.E.2d 13 (N.Y. 1956)
136 N.E.2d 13
153 N.Y.S.2d 899

Citing Cases

Mtr. of Duffy v. Carey

The court stated: "The record discloses an honest difference of opinion between him and the Civil Service…

Matter of Kordal v. Niesley

However, where notice of a determination is required to be given directly to parties affected thereby, the…