From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gaiman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 7, 1999
262 A.D.2d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

June 7, 1999

Respondent was admitted to practice by this court in 1979 and maintains an office for the practice of law in Monticello, Sullivan County.

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards (Michael Philip Jr. of counsel), Albany, for petitioner.

Sarah Diane Mc Shea, New York City, for respondent.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, SPAIN, CARPINELLO and GRAFFEO, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, moves for an order suspending respondent from practice pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (f) by reason of his conviction in April 1999 in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York of the Federal felony of aiding in the filing of a false tax return ( 26 U.S.C. § 7206). He is scheduled to be sentenced on July 15, 1999.

Respondent has been convicted of a serious crime mandating his interim suspension (Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (d), (f); Matter of Ronder, 91 A.D.2d 1146). He consents to the interim suspension.

We grant petitioner's motion and suspend respondent from the practice of law, effective immediately, and until such time as a final disciplinary order is made pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (g).

ORDERED that petitioner's motion to suspend respondent from the practice of law is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law, effective immediately, until such time as a final disciplinary order is made pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (g); and it is further

ORDERED that, for the period of suspension, respondent is commanded to desist and refrain from the practice of law in any form, either as principal or as agent, clerk or employee of another; and he is forbidden to appear as an attorney or counselor-at-law before any court, judge, justice, board, commission, or other public authority, or to give to another an opinion as to the law or its application, or any advice in relation thereto; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent shall comply with the provisions of this court's rule ( 22 NYCRR 806.9) regulating the conduct of suspended attorneys; and it is further

ORDERED that petitioner, within ten days of respondent's sentencing, shall submit an order requiring respondent to show cause why a final order of suspension, censure or removal from office should not be made pursuant to Judiciary Law § 90 (4) (g).


Summaries of

Matter of Gaiman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 7, 1999
262 A.D.2d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Gaiman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT S. GAIMAN, an Attorney and Counselor-at-Law…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 7, 1999

Citations

262 A.D.2d 706 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
691 N.Y.S.2d 593

Citing Cases

Matter of Gaiman

In April 1999, respondent pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New…

In the Matter of Kushner

Respondent consents to the relief requested by petitioner. Respondent has been convicted of a serious crime…