From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Gaiman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 8, 1999
264 A.D.2d 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)

Opinion

September 8, 1999

Respondent was admitted to practice by this court in 1979 and maintained an office for the practice of law in Monticello, Sullivan County.

Mark S. Ochs, Committee on Professional Standards (Michael Philip Jr. of counsel), Albany, for petitioner.

Sarah Diane McShea, New York City, for respondent.

Before: CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, SPAIN, CARPINELLO and GRAFFEO, JJ.


MEMORANDUM AND ORDER


In April 1999, respondent pleaded guilty in the United States District Court for the Southern District of New York to the Federal felony of aiding in the filing of a false tax return ( 26 U.S.C. § 7206). He then consented to his suspension from practice, based on his conviction of a serious crime, until such time as this court made a final disciplinary order ( 262 A.D.2d 706, 691 N.Y.S.2d 593). Respondent has filed an affidavit of compliance with the suspension order, which was made effective June 7, 1999. On July 15, 1999, respondent was sentenced to one year of probation, a $1,000 fine, and a $100 assessment. He has paid the monetary penalties.

Petitioner, the Committee on Professional Standards, now moves for entry of a final disciplinary order. It appears from the papers submitted by respondent in mitigation, including character affidavits from a number of attorneys who know him well and a plea for disciplinary leniency by the sentencing judge, that respondent's crime was an aberrational lapse in judgment in a legal career with an otherwise unblemished disciplinary record. Respondent expresses remorse for his transgression.

Under the particular circumstances presented, we grant petitioner's motion and conclude that respondent should be suspended for a period of three months, nunc pro tunc to June 7, 1999 (see, e.g., Matter of Neroni, 185 A.D.2d 1015, 186 A.D.2d 860). In view of the expiration of said period, respondent is hereby reinstated to practice, without further proceedings in this court (see, e.g., Matter of Chulak, 251 A.D.2d 744).

CARDONA, P.J., MERCURE, SPAIN, CARPINELLO, and GRAFFEO, JJ., concur.

ORDERED that petitioner's motion is granted; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is suspended from the practice of law for a period of three months, nunc pro tunc to June 7, 1999; and it is further

ORDERED that respondent is reinstated as an attorney and counselor-at-law in the State of New York, effective immediately.


Summaries of

Matter of Gaiman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Sep 8, 1999
264 A.D.2d 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
Case details for

Matter of Gaiman

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of ROBERT S. GAIMAN, a Suspended Attorney and…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Sep 8, 1999

Citations

264 A.D.2d 866 (N.Y. App. Div. 1999)
694 N.Y.S.2d 809