From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

In re Faze 4 Orchestras, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 24, 1997
245 A.D.2d 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)

Opinion

December 24, 1997

Appeal from the Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board.


Faze 4 Orchestras, Ltd. was a booking agent which supplied musical entertainment for private functions. Toward that end, Faze 4 organized weekly showcases of bands for potential clients and arranged to hire the musicians chosen by the client for a particular performance. Faze 4 negotiated and contracted with the client, set the band's fee and instructed the band with respect to the date, time and place of the assignment. At each performance, a sign bearing the name of "Faze 4 Orchestras" was displayed before the band. Faze 4 paid the band or its individual members according to a negotiated fee out of the proceeds of the contractual sum received from the client. The Unemployment Insurance Appeal Board ruled that Faze 4 exercised sufficient direction and control over the musicians' work to establish their status as Faze 4's employees and sustained the initial determination assessing Faze 4 additional contributions for remuneration paid to the musicians.

The factual question of whether an employer-employee relationship exists is for the Board to resolve and its determination, if supported by substantial evidence, will not be disturbed, even where the record could support a contrary conclusion ( see, Matter of Cameryn Entertainment Co. [Hartnett], 174 A.D.2d 859). Recognizing that professional musicians are not subject to direct supervision or control ( see, Matter of Sims [Hudacs], 196 A.D.2d 912), we nonetheless find that the record here contains substantial evidence to support the Board's decision ( see, id.; Matter of Cameryn Entertainment Co. [Hartnett], supra; Matter of Captain Kishka [Hartnett], 158 A.D.2d 814, lv denied 76 N.Y.2d 708) and, accordingly, affirm.

Cardona, P.J., Mikoll, Crew III, Yesawich Jr. and Peters, JJ., concur.

Ordered that the decision is affirmed, without costs.


Summaries of

In re Faze 4 Orchestras, Ltd.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Dec 24, 1997
245 A.D.2d 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
Case details for

In re Faze 4 Orchestras, Ltd.

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FAZE 4 ORCHESTRAS, LTD., Appellant. JOHN E. SWEENEY, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Dec 24, 1997

Citations

245 A.D.2d 929 (N.Y. App. Div. 1997)
666 N.Y.S.2d 857

Citing Cases

Matter of Franks

After an unsuccessful administrative appeal, McClure appeals. The factual question of whether an…

In re Omnipop

While Omnipop did make referrals, required a deposit to secure a performer for an event and fielded client…