From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Emerson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 26, 1993
189 A.D.2d 712 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)

Opinion

January 26, 1993

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Judith B. Sheindlin, J.).


The evidence that appellant joined two other individuals in forming a triangular formation around the victim blocking the victim's escape while one of the other perpetrators robbed the victim of money, was sufficient to establish appellant's in-concert liability for the robbery notwithstanding that appellant never touched or spoke to the victim (see, People v Corbett, 162 A.D.2d 415, lv denied 77 N.Y.2d 837; see also, Matter of Wade F., 49 N.Y.2d 730). Given that appellant also left the scene with the other two perpetrators, we find nothing especially indicative of innocence in the fact that he remained in the area after the robbery and did not flee when approached by the police in the company of the victim. We have considered appellant's remaining contention and find it to be without merit.

Concur — Sullivan, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach and Asch, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Emerson

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Jan 26, 1993
189 A.D.2d 712 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
Case details for

Matter of Emerson

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of EMERSON D., a Person Alleged to be a Juvenile Delinquent…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Jan 26, 1993

Citations

189 A.D.2d 712 (N.Y. App. Div. 1993)
592 N.Y.S.2d 721

Citing Cases

People v. Sims

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (Richard Lowe, III, J.). Viewing the evidence in a light most…

People v. McDonald

Applying this standard, we cannot say that the jury's verdict was irrational. Evidence providing a rational…