From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Dukelow v. Lum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 1985
112 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Opinion

July 15, 1985

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Dutchess County (Rosenblatt, J.).


Judgment affirmed, with costs.

Inasmuch as there was a rational basis for the determination dismissing the petitioner, a probationary employee who had been on medical leave without pay for some five months prior to the termination of her employment, the determination sought to be reviewed was neither arbitrary nor capricious ( see, Matter of Talamo v. Murphy, 38 N.Y.2d 637, 639). Nor is there any support for petitioner's contention that there was a discriminatory motive for her discharge in contravention of Executive Law § 296 ( see, Matter of Miller v. Ravitch, 60 N.Y.2d 527, 532) since the record indicates that she was not reasonably able to perform the duties of the subject position. Brown, J.P., Weinstein, Niehoff and Lawrence, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Dukelow v. Lum

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 15, 1985
112 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)
Case details for

Dukelow v. Lum

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CATHERINE DUKELOW, Appellant, v. JOHN C. LUM, as Director…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 15, 1985

Citations

112 A.D.2d 302 (N.Y. App. Div. 1985)

Citing Cases

Matter of Skidmore v. Abate

Petitioner was not entitled to a hearing prior to her termination since the probationary period of her…