From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Duester v. McGuire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 1981
81 A.D.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Opinion

April 28, 1981


Order and judgment, Supreme Court, New York County, entered January 7, 1980, directing that an accident disability retirement pension be granted to petitioner-respondent, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs or disbursements, and the matter remanded to the Medical Board of the Police Pension Fund. (See Matter of De Milia v McGuire, 76 A.D.2d 1039, affd 52 N.Y.2d 463; Uniformed Firefighters Assn. Local 94, IAFF, AFL-CIO v Beekman, 76 A.D.2d 1043, affd 52 N.Y.2d 463.) Special Term erred when it granted the pension. This power resides in the board of trustees (Administrative Code of the City of New York, § B18-43.0). It may not be assumed by the court (Matter of Meschino v Lowery, 34 A.D.2d 255, 259) which must remand when there has been an arbitrary or capricious determination. Reconsideration by the medical board is necessary. It made no findings concerning the heart condition, prolapse of the mitral valve, for which the petitioner-respondent was being treated by his personal physician and which triggered the application for accident disability pension.

Concur — Murphy, P.J., Kupferman, Sullivan, Markewich and Lynch, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Duester v. McGuire

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Apr 28, 1981
81 A.D.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)
Case details for

Matter of Duester v. McGuire

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of FRANCIS X. DUESTER, Respondent, v. ROBERT McGUIRE, as…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Apr 28, 1981

Citations

81 A.D.2d 553 (N.Y. App. Div. 1981)

Citing Cases

Mccarthy v. Police Pension Fund

McCarthy v Board of Trustees of the New York City Police Pension Fund, 306 AD2d 156 (1st Dept 2003). The…

Matter of Perkins v. Bd. of Trustees of N.Y

Such finding, however, should have resulted in an order directing reconsideration by the board of trustees.…