From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Crystal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 5, 1994
204 A.D.2d 105 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)

Opinion

May 5, 1994

Appeal from the Family Court, New York County (Sheldon Rand, J.).


Clear and convincing evidence supports Family Court's finding that during the four-year period prior to the filing of the petition respondent had only sporadic contact with the children and none with the child care agency caseworker, and that he knew or should have known that his children were in kinship foster care with their maternal grandmother since his incarceration did not begin until two years after such placement. Because respondent failed to keep the agency apprised of his whereabouts for at least six months, the agency was not required to make diligent efforts to encourage and strengthen the parental relationship (Social Services Law § 384-b [e] [i]), and respondent's parental rights were properly terminated for permanent neglect (Social Services Law § 384-b [a]).

Concur — Carro, J.P., Rosenberger, Wallach, Kupferman and Williams, JJ.


Summaries of

Matter of Crystal

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
May 5, 1994
204 A.D.2d 105 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
Case details for

Matter of Crystal

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of CRYSTAL K. and Another, Children Alleged to be Neglected…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: May 5, 1994

Citations

204 A.D.2d 105 (N.Y. App. Div. 1994)
611 N.Y.S.2d 528

Citing Cases

Matter of Sasha R

Moreover, respondent could always have used the mails. Since the father "failed to keep the agency apprised…

In re Commitment of Custody of Dominique S

Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Rubin, Friedman, JJ. The finding of permanent neglect is supported by…