Opinion
October 19, 2000.
Orders of disposition, Family Court, New York County (Mary Bednar, J.), entered on or about March 15, 1996, terminating respondent's parental rights to the subject children and committing their guardianship and custody to petitioner agency and the Commissioner of Social Services for the purposes of adoption, upon a fact-finding determination of permanent neglect, unanimously affirmed, without costs.
Kenneth Rabb, for Dominique S.
Dennis Houdek, for respondent-appellant.
Jeremiah Quinlin, for petitioners-respondents.
Before: Tom, J.P., Mazzarelli, Lerner, Rubin, Friedman, JJ.
The finding of permanent neglect is supported by clear and convincing evidence that respondent, while incarcerated, failed to maintain substantial contact with the children for more than a year (Social Services Law § 384-b[a]; see, Matter of Gregory B., 74 N.Y.2d 77, 88-90; Matter of Thomas G. 165 A.D.2d 729). It does not avail respondent to argue that the agency failed to arrange visitation or make other diligent efforts to encourage his parental relationship with the children while he was incarcerated, respondent having failed for a period of more than six months after he was incarcerated to inform the agency of his whereabouts (Social Services Law § 384-b[e][i]; see, Matter of Crystal K. 204 A.D.2d 105). Moreover, clear and convincing evidence shows that even before his incarceration, and despite the agency's diligent efforts to assist him, respondent failed to take the steps necessary to plan for the children's future. The only plan he ever offered was to propose at various times that the children live with his mother, his sisters or his girlfriend, all of whom were either unable, unwilling or ill-suited to provide an adequate, stable home (see, Matter of Charles Frederick Eugene M., 171 A.D.2d 343, 347, appeal dismissed 79 N.Y.2d 977). It is in the children's best interests that they be freed for adoption by the related foster families with whom they have lived since infancy, and thrived (see, Matter of Joseph Jerome H., 224 A.D.2d 224).
THIS CONSTITUTES THE DECISION AND ORDER OF SUPREME COURT, APPELLATE DIVISION, FIRST DEPARTMENT.