From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Matter of Caney v. Straight

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 19, 1949
274 App. Div. 1077 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

January 19, 1949.

Present — Foster, P.J., Brewster, Deyo, Santry and Bergan, JJ.


Appeal from award of compensation benefits. Claimant was employed as a pastry cook in a summer resort hotel in the Adirondack area. Her working hours were from 7:00 A.M. to 8:30 P.M., seven days a week. She lived on her employer's premises during the period of employment. The employer furnished cottages for claimant and other employees. Claimant had a rest period of from one to two hours in the afternoon whenever she could get away from her work. She regarded herself as always on call within the range of her working hours. While she could have left the resort during her rest period, distance and lack of personal facilities of transport made this difficult. While on her rest period she went to the cottage of a fellow employee to return a book. She fell on a "peculiar step" leading to the cottage, located in such relation to the door that it could have been found to be a hazard. The case falls within the pattern of injuries sustained during rest periods, of which Matter of White v. Williamson ( 246 App. Div. 874), Matter of Sullivan v. Motor Realty Corp. ( 272 App. Div. 986) and Matter of Fuller v. Title Guar. Trust Co. ( 223 App. Div. 173) are examples. Award unanimously affirmed, with costs to the Workmen's Compensation Board.


Summaries of

Matter of Caney v. Straight

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jan 19, 1949
274 App. Div. 1077 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Matter of Caney v. Straight

Case Details

Full title:In the Matter of the Claim of LILLIAN A. CANEY, Respondent, against BEN…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jan 19, 1949

Citations

274 App. Div. 1077 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Citing Cases

Matter of Leonard v. Peoples Camp Corp.

This same witness said that in an emergency he would feel free to call upon decedent to perform work on his…

Golini v. Nachtigall

Where an act of an employee has a dual purpose or benefit both to the employer and employee it may be…