Opinion
Gen. No. 38,704. (Abstract of Decision.)
Opinion filed February 23, 1940
CONTEMPT, § 33 — jurisdiction of the subject matter, enjoining barbers from price cutting. In contempt proceeding against barbers for violating injunction against unfair competition by price cutting, court had jurisdiction of the subject matter of the cause under its general chancery powers, and such injunction did not violate criminal statute prohibiting price fixing of commodities, as barbering is a service, no common law principle was violated by the injunction, and question as to constitutionality were waived by appeal to the Appellate Court.
See Callaghan's Illinois Digest, same topic and section number.
Appeal from Superior Court of Cook county; Hon. PETER H. SCHWABA, presiding.
Affirmed. Heard in second division, first district, at February term, 1936.
Harvey Young, for appellants;
Bailey Samelow Stanton, for appellees.
"Not to be published in full." Opinion filed February 23, 1940.