Maskins v. Roe

Full title: Joseph Eugene MASKINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernie ROE, Warden…

Court: United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit

Date published: Nov 14, 2001

21 F. App'x 780 (9th Cir. 2001)

Opinion

21 Fed.Appx. 780 (9th Cir. 2001) Joseph Eugene MASKINS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Ernie ROE, Warden, Respondent-Appellee. No. 00-55616. D.C. No. CV-99-8509-MMM. United States Court of Appeals, Ninth Circuit. November 14, 2001

Submitted November 6, 2001 ^*.

* The panel finds this case appropriate for submission without oral argument pursuant to Fed. R.App. 34(a)(2).

NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Margaret M. Morrow, District Judge, Presiding.

Before PREGERSON, REINHARDT and SILVERMAN, Circuit Judges.

MEMORANDUM ^**

** This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.

We reverse the dismissal of petitioner's writ of habeas corpus and remand the petition to the district court in light of Whalem/Hunt v. Early, 233 F.3d 1146 (9th Cir.2000) (en banc). We remand for the purpose of the factual development of petitioner's claims regarding equitable tolling and statutory tolling under 28 U.S.C. § 2244(d)(1)(B).

REVERSED and REMANDED.