Opinion
Argued and Submitted April 2, 2002.
NOT FOR PUBLICATION. (See Federal Rule of Appellate Procedure Rule 36-3)
Appeal From the United States District Court for the Central District of California, Gary A. Feess, District Judge, Presiding.
Before PREGERSON, TROTT, Circuit Judges, and FITZGERALD, District Judge.
The Honorable James M. Fitzgerald, Senior District Judge for the District of Alaska sitting by designation.
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and may not be cited to or by the courts of this circuit except as may be provided by the Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3.
Petitioner Daniel Martinez appeals the district court's dismissal of his 28 U.S.C. § 2254 habeas corpus petition. In a report and recommendation, a U.S. Magistrate Judge thoroughly analyzed Petitioner's claims. The district court adopted the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation and dismissed the petition.
On appeal, Petitioner does not present any basis upon which the district court's judgment could be overturned. Accordingly, we affirm for the reasons stated in the Magistrate Judge's report and recommendation as adopted by the district court.
AFFIRMED.