From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martinelli v. Hessekiel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 27, 1987
132 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Opinion

July 27, 1987

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Kings County (Jones, J.).


Ordered that the order is reversed, on the law, with costs, the motion is granted, the complaint is dismissed insofar as it is asserted against the appellant, and the plaintiffs' action against the remaining defendants is severed.

The plaintiffs were required to provide an affidavit of merit by a person competent to attest to the meritorious nature of the claim. In a medical malpractice action, expert medical opinion evidence is required to demonstrate merit (see, Fiore v. Galang, 105 A.D.2d 970, affd 64 N.Y.2d 999; Amodeo v. Radler, 89 A.D.2d 594, affd 59 N.Y.2d 1001; Saeed v. Boulevard Hosp., 109 A.D.2d 831). No affidavit of merit was provided here. In the absence of such an affidavit the appellant's motion for summary judgment as to it should have been granted. Lawrence, J.P., Kunzeman, Kooper and Spatt, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Martinelli v. Hessekiel

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 27, 1987
132 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)
Case details for

Martinelli v. Hessekiel

Case Details

Full title:MARGARET MARTINELLI et al., Respondents, v. RALPH HESSEKIEL et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 27, 1987

Citations

132 A.D.2d 691 (N.Y. App. Div. 1987)

Citing Cases

Pantaliano v. Goodman

In order to avoid the adverse impact of an order of preclusion, a party must establish both a reasonable…