From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Amodeo v. Radler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 19, 1982
89 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

July 19, 1982


In a medical malpractice action, defendant Bruce Radler appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Calabretta, J.), dated August 25, 1981, which denied, as moot, his motion for summary judgment dismissing the action as against him for failure of plaintiffs to timely serve a bill of particulars pursuant to a prior conditional order of preclusion. Order reversed, on the law, with $50 costs and disbursements and motion for summary judgment dismissing the action as against defendant Radler granted. The record in this case and the arguments raised by former counsel to the plaintiffs establish only law office failure which is, by law, not a reasonable excuse for a delay in complying with a conditional preclusion order for a period of more than three months. (See Gohery v. Spartan Concrete Corp., 85 A.D.2d 678, affd 56 N.Y.2d 785.) Plaintiffs have also failed to establish the legal merits of this action by an affidavit from a physician competent to attest to the meritorious nature of their claim. Damiani, J.P., O'Connor, Thompson and Brown, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Amodeo v. Radler

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Jul 19, 1982
89 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Amodeo v. Radler

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY AMODEO et al., Respondents, v. BRUCE RADLER, Appellant, et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Jul 19, 1982

Citations

89 A.D.2d 594 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

White v. Leonard

It is well established that in order for a plaintiff to avoid the adverse impact of an order of preclusion,…

Smith v. Palmieri

¶ The order and judgment dated April 19, 1983, must nevertheless be affirmed, as the original complaint in…