From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Martin v. Zangrillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 19, 1992
186 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)

Opinion

October 19, 1992

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Nassau County (Kutner, J.).


Ordered that the appeal from the order is dismissed; and it is further,

Ordered that the judgment is affirmed; and it is further,

Ordered that the plaintiffs are awarded one bill of costs.

The appeal from the intermediate order must be dismissed because the right of direct appeal therefrom terminated with the entry of judgment in the action (see, Matter of Aho, 39 N.Y.2d 241, 248). The issues raised on appeal from the order are brought up for review and have been considered on the appeal from the judgment (see, CPLR 5501 [a] [1]).

The plaintiffs moved for leave to enter a judgment against the defendants, upon their default in answering, but submitted neither a verified complaint nor a sworn statement showing that the action was meritorious. The court denied the motion. Thereafter, the plaintiffs renewed their motion, and submitted the complaint verified by the plaintiffs' attorney. Upon a motion for leave to enter a default judgment, CPLR 3215 (e) (now subd [f]) requires, inter alia, "proof by affidavit made by the party of the facts constituting the claim, the default and the amount due". However, where, as here, the plaintiffs' attorney has personal knowledge of the facts constituting the claim, the complaint is sufficient to satisfy the affidavit requirement of CPLR 3215 (e) (now subd [f]) (see, CPLR 3020 [d] [3]; 105 [t]; see also, Colonial Country Club v Village of Ellenville, 88 A.D.2d 1027).

Furthermore, the Supreme Court was correct in considering the second motion to be one for renewal rather than reargument. O'Brien, J.P., Copertino, Pizzuto and Santucci, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Martin v. Zangrillo

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Oct 19, 1992
186 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
Case details for

Martin v. Zangrillo

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE MARTIN et al., Respondents, v. ERNEST ZANGRILLO et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Oct 19, 1992

Citations

186 A.D.2d 724 (N.Y. App. Div. 1992)
589 N.Y.S.2d 180

Citing Cases

Wilens v. Unique Opportunity U.S.

Additionally, plaintiff can also use deposition testimony (Empire Chevrolet Sales Corporation v Spallone, 304…

U.S. Bank v. FCA

Additionally, plaintiff can also use deposition testimony (Empire Chevrolet Sales Corporation v Spallone, 304…