From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Colonial Country Club v. Vil. of Ellenville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 3, 1982
88 A.D.2d 1027 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Opinion

June 3, 1982


Appeal from an order of the Supreme Court at Special Term (Cobb, J.), entered September 16, 1981 in Ulster County, which denied plaintiff's motion for a default judgment and an assessment of damages against defendant Village of Ellenville and permitted the latter to serve an answer. Since plaintiff failed to comply with the requirements of CPLR 3215 (subd [e]), we affirm. Entry of a default judgment is allowable only when the applicant files proof of service of the summons and complaint accompanied by an "affidavit made by the party of the facts constituting the claim, the default and the amount due" (CPLR 3215, subd [e]). With respect to the facts of the claim and amount due, a verified complaint, if one has been served, may be substituted for the affidavit. Here a verified complaint was not served and the moving affidavit was made by plaintiff's attorney rather than one of its officers. As that affidavit could not suffice to fulfill the statute's requirements, any judgment entered thereon would have been a nullity and its vacatur would have been required ( Natemeier v Heim, 81 A.D.2d 1008; Union Nat. Bank v Davis, 67 A.D.2d 1034). We see no need to address any other issue. Order affirmed, with costs. Mahoney, P.J., Sweeney, Main, Casey and Yesawich, Jr., JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Colonial Country Club v. Vil. of Ellenville

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department
Jun 3, 1982
88 A.D.2d 1027 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)
Case details for

Colonial Country Club v. Vil. of Ellenville

Case Details

Full title:COLONIAL COUNTRY CLUB, INC., Appellant, v. VILLAGE OF ELLENVILLE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Third Department

Date published: Jun 3, 1982

Citations

88 A.D.2d 1027 (N.Y. App. Div. 1982)

Citing Cases

Provost Bros. v. Diamond

The "affidavit of the facts constituting the claim" was made by plaintiff's attorney and not by the party…

Nolan v. Keiser

We hold that the challenged orders should be affirmed. Examination of the records in these actions reveals…