Opinion
No. 07-55439.
The panel unanimously finds this case suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed.R.App.P. 34(a)(2).
January 2, 2008.
Lawrence Eugene Martin, Yucca Valley, CA, pro se.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California; Dale S. Fischer, District Judge, Presiding. D.C. No. CV-06-00525-DSF.
Before: LEAVY, W. FLETCHER and FISHER, Circuit Judges.
MEMORANDUM
This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by 9th Cir. R. 36-3.
To the extent a certificate of appealability is necessary for this appeal, the request for a certificate of appealability is denied. See 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2).
To the extent a certificate of appealability is not necessary for this appeal, we sua sponte grant appellant in forma pauperis status for this appeal. The Clerk shall change the docket to reflect appellant forma pauperis status.
A review of the record indicates that the questions raised in this appeal are so in-substantial as not to require further argument. See United States v. Hooton, 693 F.2d 857, 858 (9th Cir. 1982) (per curiam) (stating standard). Accordingly, we summarily affirm the district court's judgment.