From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Marino v. Marino

Appellate Court of Connecticut.
Oct 24, 2023
222 Conn. App. 902 (Conn. App. Ct. 2023)

Opinion

AC 45920

10-24-2023

John MARINO v. Donna MARINO


Per Curiam.

The judgment is affirmed. The defendant's claims on appeal are inadequately briefed, and, thus, we decline to review them. See Pryor v. Pryor, 162 Conn. App. 451, 458, 133 A.3d 463 (2016).

The plaintiff did not file a brief in this appeal and did not attend oral argument before this court. We, therefore, have considered this appeal on the basis of the brief and oral argument of the defendant alone. See Kenosia Commons, Inc. v. DaCosta, 161 Conn. App. 668, 669 n.1, 129 A.3d 730 (2015).


Summaries of

Marino v. Marino

Appellate Court of Connecticut.
Oct 24, 2023
222 Conn. App. 902 (Conn. App. Ct. 2023)
Case details for

Marino v. Marino

Case Details

Full title:John MARINO v. Donna MARINO

Court:Appellate Court of Connecticut.

Date published: Oct 24, 2023

Citations

222 Conn. App. 902 (Conn. App. Ct. 2023)
302 A.3d 953