Argued June 14, 1911
Decided October 3, 1911
Edward H. Tatum for appellant.
John H. Corwin for respondent.
Order affirmed and judgment absolute ordered against appellant on the stipulation, with costs in all courts, on opinion of MILLER, J., below.
Concur: CULLEN, Ch. J., GRAY, VANN, WERNER, WILLARD BARTLETT, HISCOCK and CHASE, JJ.
Full title:WALTER B. MANNY, Appellant, v . DANIEL T. WILSON, Respondent
Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Date published: Oct 3, 1911
Based on the differentiating language contained in Section 104, since the consignee is "Metall und Rohstaff .…
Bank of New York v. Amoco Oil Co.While there is little authority on point, cases decided before the U.C.C. was adopted have applied a broad…