From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mandzych v. Karl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1969
33 A.D.2d 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Opinion

December 15, 1969


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., plaintiffs appeal from a judgment of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County, entered July 11, 1968 in favor of defendant upon a jury verdict. Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The findings of fact are affirmed. It was prejudicial error to receive in evidence the diagrammed conclusion of Officer Roodenburg in his accident report, based on his observations after the accident and statements by defendant, as to the point of impact ( Toll v. State of New York, 32 A.D.2d 47, 50; Mahon v. Giordano, 30 A.D.2d 792, 793). It was also error to receive defendant's motor vehicle accident report, filed about 14 months after the accident, as a prior consistent statement ( Crawford v. Nilan, 289 N.Y. 444, 450-451; cf. Catapano v. Francis, 31 A.D.2d 650, 651; Trampusch v. Kastner, 242 App. Div. 803). Beldock, P.J., Christ, Rabin, Benjamin and Munder, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Mandzych v. Karl

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 15, 1969
33 A.D.2d 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)
Case details for

Mandzych v. Karl

Case Details

Full title:GEORGE MANDZYCH et al., Appellants, v. HAROLD T. KARL, Respondent

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 15, 1969

Citations

33 A.D.2d 786 (N.Y. App. Div. 1969)

Citing Cases

Penner v. Central School District No. 1

The jury resolved this issue finding respondent Filmer negligent and awarding appellant damages against him,…