From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Catapano v. Francis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 1968
31 A.D.2d 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Opinion

December 23, 1968


Judgment of the Supreme Court, Queens County, entered December 20, 1965, reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to appellants to abide the event. The findings of fact below are affirmed. In our opinion it was error to receive in evidence, over appellants' objection, the self-serving written statement of defendant Francis, which was made 24 days after the accident. We consider this error sufficiently prejudicial to require a new trial. Beldock, P.J., Rabin, Benjamin, Munder and Martuscello, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Catapano v. Francis

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 23, 1968
31 A.D.2d 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)
Case details for

Catapano v. Francis

Case Details

Full title:ANTHONY CATAPANO et al., Appellants, v. ARLENE FRANCIS et al.…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 23, 1968

Citations

31 A.D.2d 650 (N.Y. App. Div. 1968)

Citing Cases

Mandzych v. Karl

Judgment reversed, on the law, and new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The findings of fact are…

Green v. Downs

And finally, it was prejudicial error to receive in evidence, over objection, that part of defendant's motor…