From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mandel v. Perez

Supreme Court of Arizona
Feb 13, 1951
71 Ariz. 352 (Ariz. 1951)

Opinion

No. 5254.

February 13, 1951.

Appeal from the Superior Court of Pima County, Lee Garrett, J.

Cusick Watkins, of Tucson, for the appellant.

Silver Silver, of Tucson, for the appellee.


On May 16, 1949, the appellee, Norman Perez filed his petition for writ of habeas corpus in the Superior Court of Pima County, Arizona, for the custody of his minor child, Shirley Ann, during the months of June, July and August of that year. The trial court, after hearing, granted the writ and appellee was given custody of said child for the period prayed for in the petition. Perle Mandel, mother of the child and respondent therein, appeals from this order.

There is no question but that the court had jurisdiction of the subject matter and of all of the parties involved, and its judgment has been fully executed. This appeal was not perfected in time for this court to affect the order in any manner, no motion having been made to advance the cause on the calendar until April of 1950. Counsel for both appellant and appellee admit that this question is now moot. With this we agree and therefore decline to consider any of the issues submitted. Inasmuch however as appellee prevailed, he should be awarded his costs in the matter and it is so ordered.

Appeal dismissed.

UDALL, C.J., and PHELPS, DE CONCINI, LA PRADE, JJ., concurring.


Summaries of

Mandel v. Perez

Supreme Court of Arizona
Feb 13, 1951
71 Ariz. 352 (Ariz. 1951)
Case details for

Mandel v. Perez

Case Details

Full title:Application of PEREZ. MANDEL v. PEREZ

Court:Supreme Court of Arizona

Date published: Feb 13, 1951

Citations

71 Ariz. 352 (Ariz. 1951)
227 P.2d 385

Citing Cases

Wilson v. Mallett

This rationale has also been applied to appellate review of habeas corpus proceedings. See J.E.W., 935 So.2d…

Hott v. Sommers

As the prevailing party, Hott is entitled to his costs on appeal upon compliance with ARCAP 21. See In re…