From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maltz v. Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 30, 1942
265 App. Div. 972 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Opinion

December 30, 1942.


Although the irregularity in the notice of appeal should have been corrected upon proof by affidavit that it was inadvertent or excusable, the notice is deemed amended and the order granting respondent's motion for a temporary injunction is affirmed, with ten dollars costs and disbursements. The first and second hearings before the appellants' trial board constituted in effect, but one trial, in the subject-matter of which the trial board had a personal interest. The proof was sufficient to justify the conclusion of the Special Term to the effect that the plaintiff could not secure a fair and impartial trial because of the implied bias on the part of the trial board, which rendered the proceeding contrary to natural justice. Lazansky, P.J., Hagarty, Johnston, Taylor and Close, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Maltz v. Rosenberg

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Dec 30, 1942
265 App. Div. 972 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)
Case details for

Maltz v. Rosenberg

Case Details

Full title:SOL O. MALTZ, Respondent, v. JACOB ROSENBERG, as President, or HARRY A…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Dec 30, 1942

Citations

265 App. Div. 972 (N.Y. App. Div. 1942)

Citing Cases

F.T. Bishop v. 2096 Amsterdam Restaurant Bar

Motion to dismiss appeal denied on condition that appellants perfect the appeal for the January, 1950, term…