From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

F.T. Bishop v. 2096 Amsterdam Restaurant Bar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 1949
276 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

November 28, 1949.

Present — Nolan, P.J., Carswell, Adel, Sneed and Wenzel, JJ.


Motion to dismiss appeal denied on condition that appellants perfect the appeal for the January, 1950, term (for which term the case is set down) and be ready for argument when reached; otherwise, motion granted, with $10 costs. The appeal should not be dismissed because of an error in specifying in the notice of appeal that the appeal is taken to the Appellate Division in the First Department instead of in the Second Department. The notice may be amended on proof that the error was inadvertent or excusable. ( People v. Schoff, 266 App. Div. 158; Maltz v. Rosenberg, 265 App. Div. 972; Vesper v. Callahan, post, p. 784, decided herewith.)


Summaries of

F.T. Bishop v. 2096 Amsterdam Restaurant Bar

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Nov 28, 1949
276 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

F.T. Bishop v. 2096 Amsterdam Restaurant Bar

Case Details

Full title:F.T. BISHOP, INC., Respondent, v. 2096 AMSTERDAM RESTAURANT BAR, INC., et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Nov 28, 1949

Citations

276 App. Div. 783 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)