From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maloney v. National Cleaning Contractors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 20, 1984
105 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Opinion

November 20, 1984

Appeal from the Supreme Court, New York County (L.I. Kaplan, J.).


The Special Term, Part 8A, order of January 6, 1984 required plaintiffs to furnish a supplemental bill of particulars as to item 19 within 30 days after completion of the examinations before trial and to include an update of special damages, to furnish medical reports or authorizations for records and to furnish hospital authorizations by February 6, 1984. It also directed examination of plaintiffs to be held within 60 days. On March 6, 1984 defendants' attorneys furnished the names of examining doctors and requested plaintiffs' attorneys to contact the doctors to schedule appointments. At the time of the service of the certificate of readiness on March 9, 1984, the supplemental bill of particulars and the reports and authorizations had not been furnished, and the physical examinations had not taken place. Yet the certificate of readiness said "Bills of particulars served"; "physical examinations completed"; "medical reports exchanged". These statements were incorrect and no acceptable excuse has been furnished for the incorrectness.

Accordingly, the motion to strike the action from the calendar should have been granted. ( Ortiz v Valdescastilla, 98 A.D.2d 610; Arroyo v City of New York, 86 A.D.2d 521; Rules of Supreme Ct of Bronx and New York Counties, 22 NYCRR 660.4 [d] [4] [iii]; see Bookazine Co. v J A Bindery, 61 A.D.2d 919.)

Concur — Asch, J.P., Silverman, Milonas and Kassal, JJ.


Summaries of

Maloney v. National Cleaning Contractors

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department
Nov 20, 1984
105 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)
Case details for

Maloney v. National Cleaning Contractors

Case Details

Full title:CATHERINE MALONEY et al., Respondents, v. NATIONAL CLEANING CONTRACTORS et…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, First Department

Date published: Nov 20, 1984

Citations

105 A.D.2d 653 (N.Y. App. Div. 1984)

Citing Cases

CRISPINO v. HOLM-ANDERSEN

Where outstanding discovery requests remain and plaintiff files a false Statement of Readiness and Note of…

Crispino v. Holm-Andersen

See Lynch v Vollono, 6 AD3d 505 [2d Dept 2009]; see Savin v Brooklyn Marine Park Development Corp., supra at…