Summary
In Malone, the question is as to whether the State as such was liable under the doctrine of respondeat superior for torts of a water-regulating district.
Summary of this case from Easley v. New York State Thruway AuthOpinion
Argued March 13, 1956
Decided June 7, 1956
Appeal from the Appellate Division of the Supreme Court in the fourth judicial department, CHARLES LAMBIASE, J.
M. Francis Malone, appellant in person.
Jacob K. Javits, Attorney-General ( John R. Davison and James O. Moore, Jr., of counsel), for respondent.
Judgment affirmed, with costs; no opinion.
Concur: CONWAY, Ch. J., DESMOND, DYE, FULD, FROESSEL, VAN VOORHIS and BURKE, JJ.