Opinion
2002-05050
Argued June 12, 2003.
August 11, 2003.
In an action, inter alia, for a judgment declaring, among other things, that a contract between the plaintiff and the defendant MZ Management Corp. is in full force and effect, the defendants MZ Management Corp. and Esseks Hefter Angel appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order of the Supreme Court, Suffolk County (Jones, J.), dated May 3, 2002, as denied their motion pursuant to CPLR 3211(a)(1) and (7) to dismiss the complaint insofar as asserted against them.
Esseks, Hefter Angel, Riverhead, N.Y. (William W. Esseks, Jane Ann R. Kratz, and Anthony C. Pasca of counsel), appellant pro se and for appellant MZ Management Corp.
Buchanan Ingersoll, P.C., New York, N.Y. (David J. Molton and Gayle N. Moran of counsel), and Certilman, Balin, Adler Hyman, Hauppauge, N.Y. (Glenn B. Gruder of counsel), for respondent (one brief filed).
Before: SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, J.P., GABRIEL M. KRAUSMAN, GLORIA GOLDSTEIN, REINALDO E. RIVERA, JJ.
DECISION ORDER
ORDERED that the order is affirmed insofar as appealed from, with costs.
According the plaintiff the benefit of every possible inference (see CPLR 3211; see also Meliso v. Pinter, 289 A.D.2d 462), the complaint sufficiently states the causes of action alleged.
FEUERSTEIN, J.P., KRAUSMAN, GOLDSTEIN and RIVERA, JJ., concur.