From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Maddox v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler
Dec 1, 2006
No. 12-06-00046-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2006)

Opinion

No. 12-06-00046-CR.

December 1, 2006.

Appeal from the 241st, Judicial District Court of smith county, Texas.

Panel consisted of WORTHEN, C.J., GRIFFITH, J., and HOYLE, J.


MEMORANDUM OPINION


Henry T. Maddox appeals his conviction for aggravated robbery, for which he was sentenced to imprisonment for thirty-eight years. Appellant's counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396, 18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967) and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). We affirm.

BACKGROUND

Appellant was charged by indictment with aggravated robbery. Appellant pleaded guilty as charged, and a trial on punishment was conducted. Ultimately, the trial court sentenced Appellant to imprisonment for thirty — eight years. This appeal followed. ANALYSIS PURSUANT TO ANDERS V. CALIFORNIA Appellant's counsel filed a brief in compliance with Anders v. California, 386 U.S. 738, 87 S. Ct. 1396,18 L. Ed. 2d 493 (1967) and Gainous v. State, 436 S.W.2d 137 (Tex.Crim.App. 1969). Appellant's counsel states that he has diligently reviewed the appellate record and is of the opinion that the record reflects no reversible error and that there is no error upon which an appeal can be predicated. He further relates that he is well acquainted with the facts in this case. In compliance with Anders, Gainous, and High v. State, 573 S.W.2d 807 (Tex.Crim.App. 1978), Appellant's brief presents a chronological summation of the procedural history of the case and further states that Appellant's counsel is unable to raise any arguable issues for appeal. We have likewise reviewed the record for reversible error and have found none.

CONCLUSION

As required by Stafford v. State , 813 S.W.2d 503 (Tex.Crim.App. 1991), Appellant's counsel has moved for leave to withdraw. We carried the motion for consideration with the merits. Having done so and finding no reversible error, Appellant's counsel's motion for leave to withdraw is hereby granted and the trial court's judgment is affirmed .


Summaries of

Maddox v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler
Dec 1, 2006
No. 12-06-00046-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2006)
Case details for

Maddox v. State

Case Details

Full title:HENRY T. MADDOX, APPELLANT, v. THE STATE OF TEXAS, APPELLEE

Court:Court of Appeals of Texas, Twelfth District, Tyler

Date published: Dec 1, 2006

Citations

No. 12-06-00046-CR (Tex. App. Dec. 1, 2006)