Opinion
No. 1:04-CV-182 (WLS).
March 30, 2006
ORDER
Before the Court is a Report and Recommendation from United States Magistrate Judge Richard L. Hodge (Doc. 30), filed on February 16, 2006. It is recommended that Plaintiff's Motion for Undisputed Facts (Doc. 19) be granted to the extent that it is actually a response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 30; see also Doc. 12). No objection has been filed.
The Court necessarily considered Plaintiffs' submissions in response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment in reviewing the first Report and Recommendation of February 16, 2006; and hereby formally acknowledges said consideration. (Docs. 17-19). For the reasons stated in its March 20, 2006 Order, the Court granted-in-part and denied-in-part Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment. (Doc. 32).
Upon full review and consideration upon the record, the Court finds that the Report and Recommendation (Doc. 30) should be, and hereby is, ACCEPTED, ADOPTED and made the Order of this Court for reason of the findings made and reasons stated therein. Accordingly, Plaintiff's Motion for Undisputed Facts (Doc. 19) is GRANTED to the extent that it is actually a response to Defendant's Motion for Summary Judgment (Doc. 12).
SO ORDERED