From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Mack v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR .
Feb 9, 2016
482 S.W.3d 449 (E.D. Mo. 2016)

Opinion

No. ED 102763

02-09-2016

Anthony K. Mack, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri, Respondent/Respondent.

Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant. Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.


Lisa M. Stroup, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, MO 63101, For Movant/Appellant. Dora A. Fichter, P.O. Box 899, Jefferson City, MO 65102, For Respondent/Respondent.

ORDER

Anthony K. Mack appeals from the motion court's judgment denying his amended Motion to Vacate, Set Aside or Correct Judgment and Sentence filed pursuant to Rule 29.15. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and conclude the judgment of the motion court was not clearly erroneous. Rule 29.15(k). An extended opinion would have no precedential value. We have, however, provided a memorandum setting forth the reasons for our decision to the parties for their use only. We affirm the judgment pursuant to Missouri Rule of Civil Procedure 84.16(b).

All rule references are to Mo. R. Crim. P. 2014, unless otherwise indicated.
--------


Summaries of

Mack v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR .
Feb 9, 2016
482 S.W.3d 449 (E.D. Mo. 2016)
Case details for

Mack v. State

Case Details

Full title:Anthony K. Mack, Movant/Appellant, v. State of Missouri…

Court:Missouri Court of Appeals, Eastern District, DIVISION FOUR .

Date published: Feb 9, 2016

Citations

482 S.W.3d 449 (E.D. Mo. 2016)