From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

M & T Bank v. Morris

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 20, 2016
138 A.D.3d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)

Opinion

04-20-2016

M & T BANK, respondent, v. Sandra MORRIS, appellant.

Sandra Morris, Saint Albans, N.Y., appellant pro se. McCabe, Weisberg & Conway, P.C., New Rochelle, N.Y. (Kiyam J. Poulson of counsel), for respondent.


Sandra Morris, Saint Albans, N.Y., appellant pro se.

McCabe, Weisberg & Conway, P.C., New Rochelle, N.Y. (Kiyam J. Poulson of counsel), for respondent.

In an action to foreclose a mortgage, the defendant appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Sampson, J.) entered April 28, 2014, which denied her motion to vacate a prior order of the same court entered October 11, 2013, which granted the plaintiff's unopposed motion, inter alia, for summary judgment.

ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In seeking vacatur of the prior order granting the plaintiff's unopposed motion, inter alia, for summary judgment, the defendant was required to demonstrate " ‘a reasonable excuse for not opposing the [prior] motion and a potentially meritorious opposition to the motion’ " (Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Rooney, 132 A.D.3d 980, 983, 19 N.Y.S.3d 543, quoting Thapt v. Lutheran Med. Ctr., 89 A.D.3d 837, 837, 932 N.Y.S.2d 346 ). The defendant failed to meet her burden of demonstrating a reasonable excuse for her default. To the extent that the defendant attributes her default to the conduct of her former attorney, we note that "undetailed [ ] and uncorroborated allegation[s] of law office failure [do] not constitute a reasonable excuse" (Aurora Loan Servs., LLC v. Lucero, 131 A.D.3d 496, 496, 14 N.Y.S.3d 707 ).

Accordingly, since the defendant failed to demonstrate a reasonable excuse for her default, the Supreme Court properly denied her motion to vacate the order, and this Court need not consider whether she proffered a potentially meritorious opposition to the motion (see CPLR 5015[a][1] ; SDF8 CBK, LLC v. 689 St. Marks Ave., Inc., 131 A.D.3d 1037, 1038, 16 N.Y.S.3d 463 ; Blythe v. BJ's Wholesale Club, Inc., 123 A.D.3d 1073, 1074, 997 N.Y.S.2d 635 ; JP Morgan Chase Bank, N.A. v. Russo, 121 A.D.3d 1048, 1049, 996 N.Y.S.2d 68 ).

MASTRO, J.P., LEVENTHAL, SGROI and MILLER, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

M & T Bank v. Morris

Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.
Apr 20, 2016
138 A.D.3d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
Case details for

M & T Bank v. Morris

Case Details

Full title:M & T BANK, respondent, v. Sandra MORRIS, appellant.

Court:Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Second Department, New York.

Date published: Apr 20, 2016

Citations

138 A.D.3d 939 (N.Y. App. Div. 2016)
138 A.D.3d 939
2016 N.Y. Slip Op. 2971

Citing Cases

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Persaud

Defendants, now by counsel, have cross-moved to, in effect, vacate their default in opposing plaintiff's…

Wells Fargo Bank, N.A. v. Persaud

Defendants, now by counsel, have cross-moved to, in effect, vacate their default in opposing plaintiff's…