From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lyons v. Bisbee

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 25, 2009
3:07-cv-00460-LRH (RAM) (D. Nev. Mar. 25, 2009)

Opinion

3:07-cv-00460-LRH (RAM).

March 25, 2009


ORDER


Before this court is Report and Recommendations of U.S. Magistrate Robert A. McQuaid, Jr. (#107) entered on February 10, 2009, recommending denying Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining Order (#71) filed on November 20, 2008. Plaintiff filed a Motion to Withhold Any Decision on Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation #107 and #108 Pending Receipt of Plaintiff's Objections (#110) on March 4, 2009, and his Objections to Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#111) on March 4, 2009. Defendants filed their Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's Objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [#107] (#113) on March 20, 2009, pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule 1B 3-2 of the Rules of Practice of the United States District Court for the District of Nevada.

Refers to court's docket number.

The Court has conducted its de novo review in this case, has fully considered the objections raised by the Plaintiff, the pleadings and memoranda of the parties and other relevant matters of record pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 636(b)(1) and Local Rule IB 3-2, and concludes that Plaintiff's objections are a reiteration of arguments previously made. No opposition need be filed by Defendants. The Court determines that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#107) entered on February 10, 2009, should be adopted and accepted.

IT IS THEREFORE ORDERED that the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation (#107) entered on February 10, 2009, is adopted and accepted, and Plaintiff's Motion for Temporary Restraining order (#71) is DENIED.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Plaintiff's Motion to Withhold Any Decision on Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation #107 and #108 Pending Receipt of Plaintiff's Objections (#110) is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS FURTHER ORDERED that Defendants' Motion for Enlargement of Time to Respond to Plaintiff's objection to the Magistrate Judge's Report and Recommendation [#107] (#113) is DENIED AS MOOT.

IT IS SO ORDERED.


Summaries of

Lyons v. Bisbee

United States District Court, D. Nevada
Mar 25, 2009
3:07-cv-00460-LRH (RAM) (D. Nev. Mar. 25, 2009)
Case details for

Lyons v. Bisbee

Case Details

Full title:PHILLIP J. LYONS, Plaintiff, v. CONNIE BISBEE, et al., Defendants

Court:United States District Court, D. Nevada

Date published: Mar 25, 2009

Citations

3:07-cv-00460-LRH (RAM) (D. Nev. Mar. 25, 2009)

Citing Cases

McLaughlin v. NDOC

However, Plaintiff does not have a liberty interest in a shortened parole eligibility date and, therefore,…

Johnson v. Garofalo

Therefore, the statutory period for bringing a § 1983 action is two years as well. See Wilson v. Garcia, 471…