From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lynde v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Mut

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 25, 1995
53 F.3d 331 (6th Cir. 1995)
Download
PDF
Check
Treatment

Summary

holding "the date on which an alleged fraud occurred is a 'circumstance' of the fraud that should be pled with particularity, especially when the face of the complaint reveals that the complaint is discovered after the applicable statute of limitations has run and the viability of the claim is totally dependent on a late discovery rule"

Summary of this case from Stout v. Fedex Ground Package Sys., Inc.
See 4 Summaries

Opinion

No. 93-4267.

April 25, 1995.

N.D.Ohio.

DECISIONS WITHOUT PUBLISHED OPINIONS

AFFIRMED

Summaries of

Lynde v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Mut

United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit
Apr 25, 1995
53 F.3d 331 (6th Cir. 1995)

holding "the date on which an alleged fraud occurred is a 'circumstance' of the fraud that should be pled with particularity, especially when the face of the complaint reveals that the complaint is discovered after the applicable statute of limitations has run and the viability of the claim is totally dependent on a late discovery rule"

Summary of this case from Stout v. Fedex Ground Package Sys., Inc.

affirming grant of attorneys' fees even though petition was filed 30 months after the district court's judgment, because "[e]ven a 'plainly unreasonable' delay does not prove laches; 'prejudice remains a significant factor.'"

Summary of this case from Sewald v. Reisinger

affirming summary judgment in favor of defendant where “plaintiff gives ... no reason why his baseline ... provides the appropriate statistic” for assessing discriminatory impact

Summary of this case from Carmichael v. City of N.Y.

identifying the factors courts consider when a party moves the district court to conditionally amend its judgment and permit the party to file an amended complaint

Summary of this case from Stanford v. United States
Case details for

Lynde v. Blue Cross Blue Shield Mut

Case Details

Full title:Lynde v. Blue Cross and Blue Shield Mut. of Ohio

Court:United States Court of Appeals, Sixth Circuit

Date published: Apr 25, 1995

Citations

53 F.3d 331 (6th Cir. 1995)

Citing Cases

Seay v. Tennessee Valley Authority

Lubetsky, 296 F.3d at 1305-06; Walker, 286 F.3d at 1275; Pressley, 977 F.2d at 297; Robinson v. Adams, 847…

U.S. ex Rel. American Textile Mfrs. Inst. v. the Limited

In general, the Sixth Circuit is " very liberal" in permitting amendments. Northwestern Nat'l Ins. Co. of…

30 Citing Cases