From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

LUGO v. VEAL

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 3, 2008
No. CIV S-06-0984 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2008)

Opinion

No. CIV S-06-0984 MCE GGH P.

October 3, 2008


ORDER


Petitioner is a state prisoner proceeding pro se with a petition for writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner challenges a 2003 decision by the California Board of Parole Hearings (BPH) finding him unsuitable for parole. On May 16, 2008, the Ninth Circuit granted rehearing en banc in Hayward v. Marshall, 512 F.3d 536 (9th Cir. 2008).

Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that within twenty days of the date of this order, the parties shall show cause why this action should not be administratively stayed pending the Ninth Circuit's decision in Hayward v. Marshall, 512 F.3d 536 (9th Cir. 2008), reh'g en banc granted, ___ F.3d ___, No. 06-55392 (9th Cir. filed May 16, 2008).


Summaries of

LUGO v. VEAL

United States District Court, E.D. California
Oct 3, 2008
No. CIV S-06-0984 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2008)
Case details for

LUGO v. VEAL

Case Details

Full title:INEZ TITO LUGO, Petitioner, v. MARTIN VEAL, et al., Respondents

Court:United States District Court, E.D. California

Date published: Oct 3, 2008

Citations

No. CIV S-06-0984 MCE GGH P (E.D. Cal. Oct. 3, 2008)