holding that the petitioner had failed to show that the amended statute created a significant risk of prolonging his incarceration because of the availability of advance hearings
Summary of this case from Chung Kao v. ParamoNo. C 10-1339 SI (pr)
11-21-2011
FELIX P. LUCERO, Petitioner, v. R.K. WONG, warden, Respondent.
The petition for writ of habeas corpus is denied on the merits.
IT IS SO ORDERED AND ADJUDGED.
SUSAN ILLSTON
United States District Judge
holding that the petitioner had failed to show that the amended statute created a significant risk of prolonging his incarceration because of the availability of advance hearings
Summary of this case from Chung Kao v. Paramoholding that the petitioner had failed to show that the amended statute created a significant risk of prolonging his incarceration because of the availability of advance hearings
Summary of this case from Hernandez v. McDonaldexplaining that it is not necessary to ask the court to judicially notice state and federal cases as legal precedent because "the court routinely considers such legal authorities in doing it legal analysis without a party requesting that they be judicially noticed."
Summary of this case from Lemieux v. Cwalt, Inc. Alt. Loan Tr.following Gilman in denying ex post facto claim
Summary of this case from Collier v. DuffyFull title:FELIX P. LUCERO, Petitioner, v. R.K. WONG, warden, Respondent.
Court:UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT NORTHERN DISTRICT OF CALIFORNIA
Date published: Nov 21, 2011
Statutes, constitutions, and the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure are all legislative facts that are not…
Wells v. Glob. Tech Indus.In any event, “such opinions may be considered ‘without a party requesting that they may be judicially…