From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Loyer v. S17 Owners Ass'n, Inc.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 7, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2014-001742 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 7, 2015)

Opinion

Appellate Case No. 2014-001742 Unpublished Opinion No. 2015-UP-469

10-07-2015

Bernard Loyer, Jr. and Sherry Loyer, Respondents, v. S17 Owners Association, Inc.; John L. Avent; Frances Avent; Sylvia S. Berger; Robert J. Berning; Jeanne M. Clavel; Greg Connell; Gerald Crawford; Bruce C. Douglas; Jonathan D. Dunn; Les Galazka; Michael V. Goransky; Frank L. Gougher; David E. Harris; Cathryn A. Knight; John H. Lacher; Kyle R. Larson; Laura Linn; Roger McCoig; Charles Wilmot Miller; Michael O'Brien; Carolyn M. Rischbieter; William Satcher; and Belinda Smith-Sullivan, Defendants, Of Whom S17 Owners Association, Inc.; John L. Avent; Frances Avent; Sylvia S. Berger; Greg Connell; Jonathan D. Dunn; Michael V. Goransky; Frank L. Gougher; David E. Harris; Cathryn A. Knight; John H. Lacher; Kyle R. Larson; Michael O'Brien; Carolyn M. Rischbieter; and Belinda Smith-Sullivan are Appellants, And of Whom Charles Wilmot Miller is a Respondent.

Philip Herman Woolhiser, of Woolhiser, Inc., of Aiken, for Appellants. Bernard Loyer, Jr., of Trenton, pro se. Sherry Loyer, of Trenton, pro se. Paul Knapp Simons, Jr., of Hull Barrett, PC, of Aiken, for Respondent Charles Wilmot Miller.


THIS OPINION HAS NO PRECEDENTIAL VALUE. IT SHOULD NOT BE CITED OR RELIED ON AS PRECEDENT IN ANY PROCEEDING EXCEPT AS PROVIDED BY RULE 268(d)(2), SCACR. Appeal From Edgefield County
Kathy Ouzts Rushton, Special Referee

AFFIRMED

Philip Herman Woolhiser, of Woolhiser, Inc., of Aiken, for Appellants. Bernard Loyer, Jr., of Trenton, pro se. Sherry Loyer, of Trenton, pro se. Paul Knapp Simons, Jr., of Hull Barrett, PC, of Aiken, for Respondent Charles Wilmot Miller. PER CURIAM : Appellants appeal a special referee's order and judgment of foreclosure and sale. We affirm pursuant to Rule 220(b), SCACR, and the following authorities: Jones v. Daley, 363 S.C. 310, 315, 609 S.E.2d 597, 599 (Ct. App. 2005) ("It is well-settled that an issue cannot be raised for the first time on appeal, but must have been raised to and ruled upon by the trial court to be preserved for appellate review." (internal quotation marks omitted)); Wilder Corp. v. Wilke, 330 S.C. 71, 76, 497 S.E.2d 731, 733 (1998) ("[A]n objection must be sufficiently specific to inform the trial court of the point being urged by the objector."). AFFIRMED. FEW, C.J., and KONDUROS and LOCKEMY, JJ., concur.

We decide this case without oral argument pursuant to Rule 215, SCACR. --------


Summaries of

Loyer v. S17 Owners Ass'n, Inc.

STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals
Oct 7, 2015
Appellate Case No. 2014-001742 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 7, 2015)
Case details for

Loyer v. S17 Owners Ass'n, Inc.

Case Details

Full title:Bernard Loyer, Jr. and Sherry Loyer, Respondents, v. S17 Owners…

Court:STATE OF SOUTH CAROLINA In The Court of Appeals

Date published: Oct 7, 2015

Citations

Appellate Case No. 2014-001742 (S.C. Ct. App. Oct. 7, 2015)