From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lowery v. Conner

Supreme Court of Mississippi
Sep 19, 1966
189 So. 2d 922 (Miss. 1966)

Opinion

No. 44357.

September 19, 1966.

Appeal from Chancery Court, Hinds County, J.C. Stennett, Chancellor.

Watkins, Pyle, Edwards Ludlam, Jackson, for appellant.

Henley, Jones Henley, Brunini, Everett, Grantham Quin, Daniel, Coker Horton, Wells, Thomas Wells, Jackson, for appellees.

Edward L. Cates, Jackson, for Dr. Oscar W. Conner.

Robertshaw Merideth, Greenville, for McClain Bowman.


ON MOTION TO DOCKET AND DISMISS AS TO DR. OSCAR W. CONNER AND McCLAIN BOWMAN


There is filed a motion to docket and dismiss this appeal insofar as Dr. Oscar W. Conner and Mr. McClain Bowman are concerned.

In the lower court Dr. Conner and Mr. Bowman were defendants. As to them the original bill was dismissed.

Judgment was rendered in favor of the complainants against the co-defendant Kelton G. Lowery.

The complainants (Mrs. Sennett Conner, et al) have not appealed from the dismissal as to Dr. Conner and Mr. Bowman (having made no attempt to file bond) although notice to the stenographer seems to have been given, and their counsel has filed herein a statement to the effect that complainants have not attempted to appeal.

The co-defendant, Lowery, has appealed and the record is here.

In view of the fact there is no appeal nor attempted appeal from the decree dismissing as to Dr. Conner and Mr. Bowman, there is nothing to docket as to them. We cannot dismiss a non-existent appeal.

The motion to docket and dismiss is itself dismissed and the matter remains in the status as disclosed by the record.

Motion to docket and dismiss denied and dismissed.

All justices concur.


Summaries of

Lowery v. Conner

Supreme Court of Mississippi
Sep 19, 1966
189 So. 2d 922 (Miss. 1966)
Case details for

Lowery v. Conner

Case Details

Full title:Kelton G. LOWERY v. Mrs. Alma G. CONNER et al

Court:Supreme Court of Mississippi

Date published: Sep 19, 1966

Citations

189 So. 2d 922 (Miss. 1966)

Citing Cases

Volkswagen of America, Inc. v. Novak

VWoA argues the lower court erred in granting MAC and Hinkle directed verdicts. It is clear from Altamil…