Opinion
No. ED 107084
09-10-2019
Shawntez LOVE, Appellant, v. STATE of Missouri, Respondent.
FOR APPELLANT, Susan A. DeGeorge, Missouri Public Defender’s Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101. FOR RESPONDENT, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
FOR APPELLANT, Susan A. DeGeorge, Missouri Public Defender’s Office, 1010 Market Street, Suite 1100, St. Louis, Missouri 63101.
FOR RESPONDENT, Dora A. Fichter, Assistant Attorney General, PO Box 899, Jefferson City, Missouri 65102.
Before Philip M. Hess, P.J., Kurt S. Odenwald, J. and Lisa P. Page, J.
ORDER
PER CURIAM Shawntez Love ("Movant") appeals the motion court’s denial, after an evidentiary hearing, of his motion for post-conviction relief under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 24.035. Movant entered a guilty plea to one count of robbery in the second degree and one count of unlawful use of a weapon. Movant contends the motion court clearly erred in denying his motion raising allegations that, prior to his guilty plea, his public defender ineffectively failed to (1) advise him he could move to suppress identification and (2) move to suppress identification. We have reviewed the briefs of the parties and the record on appeal and find the motion court did not clearly err in denying post-conviction relief. A written opinion would have no precedential value and would serve no jurisprudential purpose. The parties have been furnished with a memorandum, for their information only, setting forth the reasons for our decision.
All rule citations are to the Missouri Supreme Court Rules (2018) unless otherwise indicated.
--------
We affirm the judgment under Missouri Supreme Court Rule 84.16(b)(2) (2018).