Summary
construing pro se litigant's 42 U.S.C. § 1983 claims against a police department as being asserted against the relevant city
Summary of this case from Ernst v. HinchliffOpinion
Civ. No. 09-183 (PAM/RLE).
March 16, 2010
ORDER
This matter is before the Court on Chief Magistrate Judge Erickson's Report and Recommendation ("R R"). In the R R, Magistrate Judge Erickson recommended that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or for Summary Judgment be granted. The parties had until March 12, 2010, to file any objections. No objections were filed. Therefore, the Court therefore ADOPTS the R R (Docket No. 27).
Accordingly, IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that Defendants' Motion to Dismiss, or for Summary Judgment (Docket No. 15) is GRANTED. LET JUDGMENT BE ENTERED ACCORDINGLY.