Opinion
14-P-1358
06-04-2015
LNV CORPORATION v. ROBERT M. DUZAN.
NOTICE: Summary decisions issued by the Appeals Court pursuant to its rule 1:28, as amended by 73 Mass. App. Ct. 1001 (2009), are primarily directed to the parties and, therefore, may not fully address the facts of the case or the panel's decisional rationale. Moreover, such decisions are not circulated to the entire court and, therefore, represent only the views of the panel that decided the case. A summary decision pursuant to rule 1:28 issued after February 25, 2008, may be cited for its persuasive value but, because of the limitations noted above, not as binding precedent. See Chace v. Curran, 71 Mass. App. Ct. 258, 260 n.4 (2008).
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER PURSUANT TO RULE 1:28
For substantially the reasons set forth in the decision of the Appellate Division, we conclude that the defendant, Robert M. Duzan, has failed to demonstrate that the judge abused his discretion or committed other error, or even if there were error that any such error was properly preserved or that there was prejudice. We note that the defendant's filings before this court are inadequate appellate practice.
Decision and order of Appellate Division affirmed.
By the Court (Cypher, Trainor & Katzmann, JJ.),
The panelists are listed in order of seniority.
Clerk Entered: June 4, 2015.