From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Littleman v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Mar 18, 2015
159 So. 3d 975 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Opinion

No. 1D14–1642.

2015-03-18

Clyde LITTLEMAN, Jr., Appellant, v. STATE of Florida, Appellee.

Nancy A. Daniels , Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger , Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Clyde Littleman, Jr., pro se, Appellant. No appearance for Appellee.


An appeal from an order of the Circuit Court for Clay County. John H. Skinner, Judge.


Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Steven L. Seliger, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant; Clyde Littleman, Jr., pro se, Appellant. No appearance for Appellee.
PER CURIAM.

Based on State v. Murphy, 124 So.3d 323 (Fla. 1st DCA 2013), we affirm Appellant's judgment and sentence and reject his argument that his convictions on Counts 3 and 4 (use of a computer service to solicit a person believed to be a minor to engage in sexual conduct, § 847.0135(3)(a), Fla. Stat. (2012), and use of a computer service to solicit a person believed to be the guardian of the minor to consent to the minor's participation in sexual conduct, § 847.0135(3)(b), Fla. Stat. (2012)) violate double jeopardy because the offenses in those counts are subsumed within the offense for which he was convicted on Count 1 (traveling to meet a person believed to be a minor to engage in sexual conduct after soliciting the minor or the person believed to be by minor's guardian using a computer service, § 847.0135(4), Fla. Stat. (2012)). We recognize that our sister courts have held that double jeopardy bars dual convictions under section 847.0135(3) and (4) where, as here, the solicitation and the traveling occur on the same day,

see Shelley v. State, 134 So.3d 1138 (Fla. 2d DCA), review granted,147 So.3d 527 (Fla.2014); Hartley v. State, 129 So.3d 486 (Fla. 4th DCA 2014); Pinder v. State, 128 So.3d 141 (Fla. 5th DCA 2013), and as we have done in prior cases, we certify conflict with those decisions.

Appellant responded to a Craigslist posting and sent sexually-explicit texts and emails to undercover officers posing as a 14–year old girl and her uncle starting shortly after midnight on October 13, 2013, and he was arrested at 9:15 p.m. that same day after driving from Duval County to what he thought was the girl's residence in Clay County in order to have sex with her.

AFFIRMED; CONFLICT CERTIFIED.

WETHERELL, ROWE, and MAKAR, JJ., concur.




Summaries of

Littleman v. State

DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA
Mar 18, 2015
159 So. 3d 975 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)
Case details for

Littleman v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLYDE LITTLEMAN, JR., Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee.

Court:DISTRICT COURT OF APPEAL FIRST DISTRICT, STATE OF FLORIDA

Date published: Mar 18, 2015

Citations

159 So. 3d 975 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 2015)

Citing Cases

Littleman v. State

On appeal, after his counsel filed an Anders brief, Appellant filed a pro se brief arguing that his…

Littleman v. State

On appeal, after his counsel filed an Anders brief, Appellant filed a pro se brief arguing that his…