From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Liebe v. Nassau Cty. Civil Serv

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 2002
291 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)

Opinion

2000-11184

Argued October 30, 2001.

February 14, 2002.

In a proceeding pursuant to CPLR article 78 to review a determination of the Nassau County Civil Service Commission and the County of Nassau, dated May 7, 1999, denying the petitioner's request to have his name added to the list of eligible candidates for the position of Sanitary Engineer IV, the petitioner appeals from an order of the Supreme Court, Nassau County (DeMaro, J.), dated August 24, 2000, which granted the respondents' motion for leave to reargue a judgment of the same court, dated March 20, 2000, granting the petition, and upon reargument, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

Louis D. Stober, Jr., LLC, Garden City, N.Y., for appellant.

Lorna B. Goodman, County Attorney, Mineola, N.Y. (Mary Elisabeth Ostermann of counsel), for respondents.

Before: A. GAIL PRUDENTI, P.J., DAVID S. RITTER, SANDRA J. FEUERSTEIN, SANDRA L. TOWNES, JJ.


ORDERED that the order is affirmed, with costs.

The respondents' refusal to add the petitioner's name to the list of eligible candidates for the permanent position of Sanitary Engineer IV was not arbitrary and capricious. Civil Service Law § 52(1) provides that vacancies shall be filled, as far as practicable, by promotion of persons holding lower grade positions in the direct line of promotion (see, Hewlett v. Evans, 82 A.D.2d 920; Valdes v. Krone, 28 A.D.2d 748, affd 21 N.Y.2d 934). In this case, the petitioner did not hold a position in the direct line of promotion, the position he sought was permanent, not provisional, and there was no showing that it was impracticable or against public interest to limit eligibility to persons holding such direct line positions (see, Civil Service Law § 52; Matter of Engoren v. County of Nassau, 163 A.D.2d 520; cf., Campbell v. Bartlett, 49 A.D.2d 762). Accordingly, the Supreme Court properly granted the respondents' motion for leave to reargue and, upon reargument, denied the petition and dismissed the proceeding.

PRUDENTI, P.J., RITTER, FEUERSTEIN and TOWNES, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Liebe v. Nassau Cty. Civil Serv

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Feb 14, 2002
291 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
Case details for

Liebe v. Nassau Cty. Civil Serv

Case Details

Full title:IN THE MATTER OF RICHARD LIEBE, appellant, v. NASSAU COUNTY CIVIL SERVICE…

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Feb 14, 2002

Citations

291 A.D.2d 451 (N.Y. App. Div. 2002)
737 N.Y.S.2d 557

Citing Cases

In Matter of Patalano v. Nassau County

It is noted that the Petitioner has not challenged the procedural/technical basis for seeking reargument in…