From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 9, 1998
710 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Opinion

No. 97-1515

Opinion filed June 9, 1998.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Okaloosa County. Jere Tolton, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, and Glen P. Gifford, Assistant Public Defender, Tallahassee, for Appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Attorney General, and Giselle Lylen Rivera, Assistant Attorney General, Tallahassee, for Appellee.


Appellant challenges his convictions and sentences imposed following remand from an earlier appeal. While we do not find the prison and probationary terms imposed after appellant's successful appeal to be impermissibly harsher than the original sentences, we do conclude that the imposition of restitution for the first time on remand constituted a prohibited enhancement.See Brooks v. State, 655 So.2d 238 (Fla. 1st DCA 1995); Jones v. State, 590 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Abt v. State, 581 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991); Morganti v. State, 573 So.2d 820 (Fla. 1991). We therefore reverse the imposition of restitution and remand with instructions for the trial court to vacate that part of the sentence. In all other respects, the convictions and sentences are affirmed.

AFFIRMED in part; REVERSED in part; REMANDED.

LAWRENCE and DAVIS, JJ., Concur.


Summaries of

Lee v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 9, 1998
710 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)
Case details for

Lee v. State

Case Details

Full title:BRIAN DAVID LEE, Appellant, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, Appellee

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 9, 1998

Citations

710 So. 2d 1050 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1998)

Citing Cases

Edmondson v. State

Upon resentencing, the court imposed sex offender conditions in the order of probation. The appellant…