From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 6, 1995
655 So. 2d 238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Opinion

No. 94-1023.

June 6, 1995.

An appeal from the Circuit Court for Clay County; Peter L. Dearing, Judge.

Nancy A. Daniels, Public Defender, Glen P. Gifford, Asst. Public Defender, Tallahassee, for appellant.

Robert A. Butterworth, Atty. Gen., Richard Parker, Asst. Atty. Gen., Tallahassee, for appellee.


Appellant claims that the trial court impermissibly ordered restitution upon resentencing following remand from this court, where no restitution was imposed at the original sentencing. We agree and remand to the trial court with directions to vacate the order of restitution. See Abt v. State, 581 So.2d 1001 (Fla. 4th DCA), review denied 591 So.2d 184 (Fla. 1991); Jones v. State, 590 So.2d 1061 (Fla. 4th DCA 1991).

WEBSTER and VAN NORTWICK, JJ., concur.


Summaries of

Brooks v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District
Jun 6, 1995
655 So. 2d 238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)
Case details for

Brooks v. State

Case Details

Full title:CLARENCE BROOKS, APPELLANT, v. STATE OF FLORIDA, APPELLEE

Court:District Court of Appeal of Florida, First District

Date published: Jun 6, 1995

Citations

655 So. 2d 238 (Fla. Dist. Ct. App. 1995)

Citing Cases

Lee v. State

Appellant challenges his convictions and sentences imposed following remand from an earlier appeal. While we…