From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Lazes v. Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1949
275 App. Div. 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)

Opinion

April 25, 1949.


In an action to recover damages for personal injuries suffered while descending exterior steps, upon which there was smooth, flat ice, and at a time when it was drizzling, and to recover for loss of services, judgment in favor of plaintiffs, entered on the verdict of a jury, reversed on the facts and a new trial granted, with costs to abide the event. The finding of the jury is against the weight of the evidence. Nolan, P.J., Adel and Wenzel, JJ., concur; Carswell, J., dissents and votes to affirm on the following cases: Costello v. Forest Hills Dwellings ( 227 App. Div. 736) ; Cantone v. City of New York ( 273 App. Div. 864); Russo v. Sorrentino ( 250 App. Div. 882, smooth ice condition); Fitzgerald v. City of New Rochelle ( 259 App. Div. 101 5, motion for leave to appeal denied 285 N.Y. 856, smooth ice condition); Williams v. City of New York ( 214 N.Y. 259, 263); Bordonaro v. Bank of Blasdell ( 285 N.Y. 606); Berkowitz v. Prudential Sav. Bank ( 269 App. Div. 988); Ringel v. Jaffe ( 254 App. Div. 892); Galvano v. Klein, Inc. ( 257 App. Div. 989) ; Galvano v. City of New York ( 260 App. Div. 926, revd. 285 N.Y. 818), and Zahn v. City of New York ( 274 App. Div. 807, affd. 299 N.Y. 581). MacCrate, J., concurs with Carswell, J.


Summaries of

Lazes v. Kaplan

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department
Apr 25, 1949
275 App. Div. 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)
Case details for

Lazes v. Kaplan

Case Details

Full title:JENNIE LAZES et al., Respondents, v. KALMAN KAPLAN et al., Appellants

Court:Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of New York, Second Department

Date published: Apr 25, 1949

Citations

275 App. Div. 790 (N.Y. App. Div. 1949)