From Casetext: Smarter Legal Research

Bordonaro v. Bank of Blasdell

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1941
33 N.E.2d 541 (N.Y. 1941)

Summary

holding that there was "a fair question of fact" where plaintiff fell in a bank entranceway when a storm had abated that morning "and that no snow was falling at the time of the accident"

Summary of this case from Raimond v. U.S.

Opinion

Argued January 22, 1941

Decided February 27, 1941

Appeal from the Supreme Court, Appellate Division, Fourth Department, MacGREGOR, J.

William J. Flynn, Philip A. Laing and Melvin Greene for appellant.

A.T. O'Neill, Frank M. Osta and Joseph A. Marion for respondent.


Judgments reversed and a new trial granted, with costs to the appellant to abide the event, on the ground that a fair question of fact was presented upon this record. No opinion.

Concur: LOUGHRAN, FINCH, RIPPEY and DESMOND, JJ. Dissenting: LEHMAN, Ch. J., LEWIS and CONWAY, JJ.


Summaries of

Bordonaro v. Bank of Blasdell

Court of Appeals of the State of New York
Feb 27, 1941
33 N.E.2d 541 (N.Y. 1941)

holding that there was "a fair question of fact" where plaintiff fell in a bank entranceway when a storm had abated that morning "and that no snow was falling at the time of the accident"

Summary of this case from Raimond v. U.S.
Case details for

Bordonaro v. Bank of Blasdell

Case Details

Full title:NINA BORDONARO, Appellant, v. BANK OF BLASDELL, Respondent

Court:Court of Appeals of the State of New York

Date published: Feb 27, 1941

Citations

33 N.E.2d 541 (N.Y. 1941)
33 N.E.2d 541

Citing Cases

Dix v. United States

Such was the situation in Amodeo v. New York City Transit Authority, 10 A.D.2d 982, 203 N.Y.S.2d 204 (Second…

Raimond v. U.S.

decided as a matter of law.") (citations omitted); Cappola, supra note 18, at 646 (affirming denial of…